Observation Notes
1) What are the rhetorical objectives or aims of the space?
a) Pathos – cute animals and little children
b) Ethos – zoo knowledge/keepers
c) Logos – people come to visit/view animals in their environments
2) Who is the audience, the stakeholders?
a) Anyone and everyone; primarily younger children under 12
3) How does this space function within the larger cultural framework of identity politics?
a) It revolves year round around the local and possible traveler coming through Fort Worth
4) Describe the physical layout of the space and how people move through the space:
a) The paths wind and go through a snake-like line throughout the whole entire park; there are also resting places with many benches and places to eat; in the Texas part there are things to do for the little ones and lots to participate in (depending upon the day you visit)
5) What kinds of people move through this space?
a) All kinds of people; all races, genders, and ages
6) Purpose:
a) What is the motive/purpose of the argument?
i) To discover is special exhibits draw more people.
b) What is the author’s desired end?
i) To figure out of the special exhibits attract more people to attend the zoo than on a regular basis
c) What genre is this argument presented in?
i)
7) Author:
a) Is the author doing this for benefit? Personal gain?
i. Not for benefit; for personal knowledge and informational gain
b) Does the author have a social or economical aspect in the writing?
i. Yes; socially this place attracts so many people, yet the economy and recent hard times could be attracting more or less people (depending on their idea of fun or entertainment)
c) How is the author trying to influence or inform the audience?
i. By studying the area of the zoo and its inhabitants (people not animals)
d) Is the author a part of that specific audience he/she is writing for? Or what group does he/she belong to?
i. Yes, I am a Zoo Crew Member
8) Audience:
a) How many audiences is the author targeting? What do we know about the audience(s) targeted? Age? Gender? Race/Ethnicity? Class? etc.
i) Many different types of audiences; We know very little about the audiences, except that they are mostly younger aged kids or anyone from any age, gender, race, or class (all types of people attend)
b) Which appeals might be most effective with the target audience? How does the author use that/those appeal(s)?
i) Pathos; with so many cute animals and interesting facts of life all around, pathos would be my choice of appeal
c) What might offend the target audience? In what ways does the author handle potentially offensive information?
i) I really cannot think of much that would offend the target audience, besides running out of snacks or things to do for the little ones
9) Context:
a) Where/when does the argument occur? (type of source, year)
i) Fort Worth Zoo/2009
b) What shape does the argument take?
i) A personal interest thought taken to the next level
c) How is the argument presented or arranged?
i) Through a hypothesis-style question
d) What media does the argument use (written, spoken, visual, etc.)? And how does the media impact the argument?
i) Written – there are all sorts of useful information all around the zoo everywhere (pamphlets as well)
ii) Spoken – the zoo keepers give chats/talks
iii) Internet – the zoo’s website provides the most up-to-date information about the zoo regarding its visitors and animals
10) Pathos:
a) How much do emotions affect the audience? The author?
i) Quite a lot; the audience can see something they do or do not like the animals do, and therefore changes their emotions; Emotions do not seem to affect me as much because I have been here many times and seen some of the animals actions
b) How does the author balance the importance of emotions with the facts?
i) The animals only know how to act natural and out of instinct, with the facts providing back up information about their actions
c) If the situation presented has not personally affected you, can you still relate and sympathize with the author?
i) Yes; if you have visited before then it can affect you
11) Ethos:
a) Does the author have a background that implies that he/she is credible and trustworthy?
i) Yes; the zoo provides only legitimate facts and information
b) Does author give proof of all claims within the argument?
i) No, not yet, more information is required
c) How credible is documentation presented in the argument?
i) Its fine; the zoo provides real facts
d) What are the author’s motives while making and presenting the argument?
i) Personal interest knowledge gain
12) Logos:
a) How accurately are the facts being presented to the targeted audience? How reliable is/are the source(s) of the facts?
i) The facts are accurate and the sources are reliable
b) If there is not actual hard evidence, how clear is the author’s reason or logic off base? Does he/she try to confuse the reader with difficult words or jargon?
i)
c) Is the "common sense" presented in the argument truly common and strong enough to stand when tested in the real world?
i) Yes; it’s very logical
13) Style:
a) How does the author’s diction (word choice) and syntax (sentence structure) impact the audience’s reception?
i)
b) What specific stylistic elements are used? Contractions, highly technical vocabulary, etc.)
i)
c) What is the effect of the stylistic elements used in the argument?
•
Spradley’s List of Concerns
•
Space: the physical place or places
•
Actor: the people involved
•
Activity: a set of related acts people do
•
Object: the physical things that are present
•
Act: single actions that people do
•
Event: a set of related activities that people carry out
•
Time: the sequencing that takes place over time
•
Goal: the things people are trying to accomplish
•
Feeling: the emotions felt and expressed
Space: very outdoor looking; lot made of wood and rustic/old looking; cold pavement; animals everywhere you look
Actor: the people are of all different ages and races; everyone can enjoy the zoo regardless of their set backs or being embarrassed to attend
Activity: walk around and view the animals; kids have things to climb on and activities to do (color, build, petting-zoo, Boo-At-The-Zoo, MOLA, etc.)
Object: benches, cages, animals, wires, pavement, wood fences, food machines, restrooms, cabanas that serve food, fans, lights, signs, poles, trees….list goes on
Act: use the restroom; little kids yell/scream; parents talk to their children with “young/cute voices” to make their kids feel excited; eat; run; write; read; talk
Event: people look at the map and then decide their layout of the day; they choose what animals they want to see based on their personal interest or the person they are with (their kids, grandkids, nephews, ect.)
Time: People usually pick out a pretty day, buy their tickets when they arrive, decide what animals they wish to see, see some, eat, see more animals, take their kids to the activities for them, then go home
Goal: Personal knowledge; entertainment for people to view animals
Feeling: Excitement, sadness, interest, curiosity