Monday, April 27, 2009
Authors Note Portfolio 3...
Letter to the Editor: In this part of the portfolio I introduce the article where I found/made my argument. Six Flags is a well known theme park that is struggling, just like many businesses, that tried something new to gain profit. I introduce the idea of how serving beer would help their business and how it could be done. I then mention how the TABC has decided to pass the request for permit and conclude with how the decision will affect only those who choose to go. This portion is mostly ethos, that adds how I feel on the subject in my own words/concerns.
Op-Ed: In the Op-Ed I apply the use of pathos and logos. I provide pathos by giving quotes from Six Flags officals as well as Judge Cooper who decided the final outcome of the situation. I feel my Op-Ed is very strong and well written because I give logical reasoning supported by statistics and pathos. I include personal stories to help give the op-ed a little umpf as well. I also feel that my conclusion is short, but to the point of what I had said throughtout the article.
Humorous: For my humorous argument I choose to use the "More XflagsX Beer. More Fun" advertisement I had been talking about. I think it clearly states my point and how I stand on the subject. I provide an obviously changed advertisement that is effective because you notice the words undernearth the X'ed out word flags that are replaced by the word Beer, which is in the same font/format. I like the idea the ad had from the start and think its very effective.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Humorous Author's Note...
Monday, April 20, 2009
Humor Point...
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Humor Argument...
The show in general is a play on words almost every show, with guest appearances by famous people here and there. On the South Park episode about fishsticks, they are using a play on words throughout the show. Timmy and Eric create a joke that everyone seems to like, but its so dumb its funny. Sometimes this method works because it catches peoples attention because of the wording, but then they take it to the next level by makin a whole episode about fishsticks. Their method of consistently repeating the word, fishsticks, throughout the episode causes you to remember the subject matter pretty well (which is a good idea if your trying to tell a specific thing to an audience or keep them interested). I also notice this method elsewhere in magazines and commercials, and it seems to work pretty well for visual use as well. The pun/play on words and repeating it causes it to stick in your mind for quite a long time, useful like I said.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Op-Ed Authors Note...
Monday, April 6, 2009
Op-Ed Prewriting...
Read several op-eds from your chosen venue. What are the general tone and assumed audience in this venue? What is interesting or unique about these pieces?
Mainly parents. They decide if their kids, whom make up most of the attendance at the theme parks, will be allowed to attend. They could be worried that their kids will be able to drink. They could also worry about other drunks messing or teasing their kids, etc. Gang members become an issue at the park, even more so when alcohol is involved. It is interesting because TABC already passed the permit license so Six Flags and Hurricane Harbor will continue to sell beer, but will this affect the parks outcome and attendance?
Decide one specific, identifiable issue or question for your focus. It needs to be related to your overall topic for this unit, but try to target a specific aspect of that topic. Describe your choice of specific topic:
Would I let my kids attend these theme parks without my supervision? No; there are many reasons why not – drunks at park, drunks driving, throwing up, fighting, gang involvement, etc.
Choose a specific course of action or approach to be taken to addressing that issue or question. Don’t just say that a policy or situation is bad. Tell your readers what should be done about it.
Texas alcohol permits are not that hard to obtain. With today’s people, we are constantly changing the way we respond to abstinence and avoidance of alcohol/drugs, yet right here is a perfect example of what we try to avoid. Alcohol at an open theme park like Six Flags will create issues for the park. Gang members will now have a fun hang out to drink at. Drunks will be getting on and off the roller coasters, and I’m sure they will get the spins and end up throwing up. It seems today’s economy has driven our thoughts to change, but in negative ways. Six Flags wants the permit to make money off of by selling the beer, people know this (and that they are overpriced) but they still attend and support by purchasing.
Determine what rhetorical appeals will be most effective for your audience (ethos, pathos, logos, style). Discuss what appeals you will use.
Ethos – I want to mention I am a student, but from my point of view if I had a child this is what I would do…
Pathos – Apply emotional appeal and points of argument/scenarios that could happened at Six Flags/Hurricane Harbor to make parents think logically about the situation
Logos – Apply facts and make claim against the idea of selling alcohol at Six Flags/Hurricane
Style – I want to approach this op-ed with a “parental” point of view. I wish to state firmly what I would do if my child was in a situation like this and how I would act. I also want to include facts to support my argument from a “parents’” point of view.
Write about what will best support your points for the rhetorical situation (facts, hard evidence, personal experience, anecdotes, referring to other authorities, etc.).
Facts – will give the trustworthiness to the op-ed
Hard evidence – relate to stories/facts
Personal Experience – gang stories at Six Flags in Houston; gives pathos here also
Is there any research that you need to do?
I could do some about the selling of alcohol at theme parks to find some logistics. I could also find some stuff about Astro World in Houston…maybe see why it closed/reasons
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Letter to the Editor - Vol 1/Vers 1
To Paul Harral:
The article, “Six Flags Over Texas, Hurricane Harbor get alcohol permits,” is clearly about the decision to legalize the distribution and consumption of alcohol in the Six Flags Over Texas and Hurricane Harbor theme parks located in Arlington, TX.
According to the article Six Flags has decided to obtain an alcohol permit in order to sell only beer. I believe selling only beer will provide a calmer atmosphere than the selling of liquor because it is a known factor that individuals become drunker, faster when they decide to drink liquor. Therefore, Six Flags has jumped that main issue by only serving beer in certain locations throughout the park. In an attempt to take the necessary precautions, both theme parks have posted signs and placed fences in certain “drinking” areas in order to keep those individuals whom are drinking in a designated area. Six Flags also provides different cups in order to tell what is inside the cups they are drinking in order to help their security officers know if they are dealing with an intoxicated individual.
Most importantly are the beneficial factors it holds for the public and the Six Flags theme park. While some choose not to drink when going out in public with their family because of the environment they are in, Six Flags leaves that option open to the individual now by providing this service. Not all older-peoples enjoy going on crazy rollercoaster rides, so they need their buzz somehow while their kids get to enjoy the theme park. For Six Flags, this opens a new side of the theme park to making money off alcohol while providing professional serving of the beer. It will allow the theme park to make a good general revenue just based of the serving of alcohol alone, and at $6 a pop for a 16-oz they will be making a good income. It is a known fact that allowing the sales and consumption of alcohol at other theme parks has been known to work and has provided a better general income for the parks.
The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has denied the request to hold a new public hearing on the concern, therefore it has been stated and clearly, that Six Flags will continue to serve beer to its patrons in an effort to fulfill its guest’s requests.
I feel that this could be a great thing for the park. It will invite thousands of older participants whom might not normally attend, but now they might have a stronger pull to. Instead of having to drink somewhere else, now they can drink in the actual park. Overall, I feel that this decision will provide a better general income for the park, without hurting the attendees or safety of those around them.
Authors Note: In this letter to the editor (vol 1) I feel that I clearly state the issue at hand in the first sentence. I then try to give the pros surrounding the issue and how the park is dealing with the current status of the park by changing it to make ready for the new permits (posting signs and fences). I try to give as much of the precautions the park has taken into choice in order to provide the feeling of safety at the park, which is the only thing, other individuals who are not drinking should be worried about. Overall I feel I recap well and try to place in the TABC factor to provide the decision regarding the permit.
Letter to the Editor - Prewriting
Summarize W/ Out Opinion: This article is about the decision to legalize the distribution and consumption of alcohol in the Six Flags Over Texas and Hurricane Harbor theme parks located in Arlington, TX.
Complete Rhetorical Analysis Chart for Original Article:
What appeals work best with the target audience: Logos – the article gives the logistics and facts that support the reason for Six Flags legalizing the distribution and consumption of alcohol within these two parks (Six Flags Over Texas and Hurricane Harbor). I think logos would be the best because it provides the logic behind the situation and what they are trying to do, based off facts and quotes provided by Six Flags officials.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the argument?
Strengths – Provides important legal officials and their points of view; strong quotes; reliable information
Weaknesses – Provides the issue that some people were against the legalization, yet they were shut down by the final decisions
Write a brief narrative of your own experience with or stake in the topic: I feel that this could be a great thing for the park. It will invite thousands of older participants whom might not normally attend, but now they might have a stronger pull to. Instead of having to drink somewhere else, now they can drink in the actual park. Overall, I feel that this decision will provide a better general income for the park, without hurting the attendees or safety of those around them.
Write a brief statement of your position in comparison to the author’s:
- I am supporting his position with additional information…by noting that allowing the sales and consumption of alcohol at other theme parks has been known to work and has provided a better general income for the parks.
- I disagree with him on these points…about the price because I feel it may be too high.
- I believe his argument is weak because it doesn’t consider…fake ID’s and dealing with them.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Unit 3: Topic
How it impacts the community: This could be a positive or negative thing for the local community, depending upon how you view drinking at theme parks.
How it affects you personally: Personally, I enjoy going to theme parks as often as I can (which isn't that often), but I don't think drinking and roller coasters are a good mix.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Draft 2 Development...
In this draft I changed up my intro paragraph a little bit, by adding how Phelps decision making skills has affected his whole life.
In the next paragraph I chose to keep the one about the night the event took place and the picture was taken, I felt this was important to keep because it would give background of the event. From here I chose to introduce how it has been affecting him as a professional swimmer both in and out of the pool, along with the consequences at hand.
Then I mention the DUI and how that affected him compared to this second legal trouble that he has had to deal with.
To add some pathos, I mention the story of myself and my little cousin watching the Beijing Olympics and how being a role model requires responsabilties.
Next paragraph I bring up the question of why Phelps hit the bong. I go into detail with quotes from Phelps concerning the public's questions and why, basically that it was a mistake that he regrets doing.
Overall I felt this draft was much better and had more analysis than the first, although I feel that more anaysis could be done. Hopefully I can wrap it up into a good paper.
Monday, March 9, 2009
Phelps - Draft 1 - Author's Note
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Two Body Sections...
Monday, March 2, 2009
Pre-writing for Rhetorical Paper...
a. They all revolve around the on-going story of Michael Phelps smoking out of a pipe that was released by a British Newspaper. Some give detailed information about the swimmer and what his family is going through. Others are blogs where people give their personal views on the situation and how it should/should not affect him in positive/negative ways. The blog is a fan based site, so it gives information from his supporters. Another source actually breaks down the events and how they have turned out. They start with the night it happened and then the processes Phelps has been going through to clear his name of this mistake. This is the story/idea that Phelps, as a national hero and 14-gold medalist, who was at the University of South Caroline partying when he decided to make a mistake that someone happened to take a picture of, then they released the picture for $100,000 to a British Newspaper who publicized the photograph, in turn causing the whole world to discover this shocking picture.
2. Order of the sources:
a. Fox News – gives the whole story; how it began and what occurred
b. NORML – gives a good view on Kellogg and their part of the story (dropping sponsorship)
c. SwimRoom.Com – gives Phelps personal blog; as well as peoples blogs and their reactions on Michaels situation
3. Why is this organization going to be effective:
a. It will provide the whole story from the start as not to mix up any details. Then the NORML will continue the argument why Kellogg Co. decided to drop him from sponsorship. Lastly, the swimroom.com will provide Michael’s personal statements about the situation, followed by his fan/supporters statements about his developing story.
4. How do you plan to transition between your sources?
a. From source 1 I will mention the situation as a whole. When the issue of his sponsors dropping him arrives, I will switch to source three. From there Ill mention source 3, this is Phelps’ national apology and his fans’ views on the blog site.
How my perspective on this issue/topic has developed as I’ve been researching and analyzing my sources…
I've begun to develop an overall idea about my perspective on this issue/topic. I notice that as an American Hero, Phelps should not be banished. He holds more gold metals than any athlete in the world, shattering world records in the pool. He is a young adult, who made a mistake, but a costly one at that. He realized that what he chose to do that night at the party was wrong, and that it should never happen again by a world-wide apology given by himself at a press conference and online videos. It has effected Phelps and his family in a negative light, losing some of his sponsors and even his "right" to swim in US swimming meets for three months. I think his few mistakes (DUI, POM) have both taught him many valuable lessons that, hopefully, he will learn from. There are many articles saying this, but even after his DUI he promised no more mistakes like these, yet another appears a year (or less?) later. As an American citizen, I see his fault in allowing these pictures to be taken of him, but he is a youthful 23 year old who is only trying to live. Its also interesting to take notice of which of his sponsors stayed and which left him.
Research Experiences...
what did you discover during your research?
I discovered the Michael Phelps is banned from USA swimming for three months. I also found out that 8 people were arrested, and some charged, who were at the party where the picture of Phelps smoking was taken. So far he has not been charged with anything and it looks like they will not have proof of him actually smoking. He also publicly apologized to the US and all his sponsors, as well as the whole republic of China and its people. The person who took the picture sold it for $100,000 grand to a British Newspaper, who were the first to publicize the picture. The person who’s pipe (bong) it was in the picture is also being charged and/or arrested for trying to sell it online on EBay.
how do the sources cover your topic?
They cover the topic in general detail as not much information has been released. This is an on-going story that continues to develop almost every couple hours. It’s neat to not keep up with the story and check every few days to see how the story is developing.
what connections do you see among the sources and the way they approach the topic?
I noticed they all tend to use a positive outlook on Phelps. While some seem more realistic with their material, they still shed positive light on him. A lot of stories have personal quotes from Phelps himself, and the Sheriff who is “charging” Phelps. It’s interesting to read the information about the Sheriff and how he is seen as a negative factor in the story/how he is viewed as a person.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
2/25 Unit Two Concerns About Sources
1. Which one provides the best/greatest amount of information?
2. Which has the best quotations?
3. Which has the most reliable/most trustworth information?
4. Are they all "primary" ?
Primary Sources:
1. Fox News - It is a trusted news station/paper that provides real/reliable information; provides reliable information about the subject with up to the hour articles about the matter at hand; There are numerous quotes, as well as comidic parts about the sheriff, that provide an in depth look at the on-going case
2. Baltimore Sun - Well known newspaper site; This source has great information about the possibility of Phelps not returning to the Olympics and that his plans are for the future are up in the air; I noticed great quotes from Michael Phelps himself throughout the article, as well as an overview of the controversy and how it has been affecting him and his family
3. Swimming Site (Phelps blog) - It has Phelps exact words; This site is a swimmers forum that provides real world accounts of the issue of Michael smoking at hand; It has his own blog and people's comments on the case; I noticed people all have different views about the issues of marijuana and professional athletes
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Unit 2: Topic
Monday, February 16, 2009
Authors Note for Portfolio...
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Workshop Feedback...
- I like this idea because I could focus my argument about the economics of the community and how it could effect the zoo, added to the fact that the zoo once was going under, but turned around and got sponsors (money); or I could just elaborate more on the facts/history of the zoo...
- I like this idea because I could say my personal reasons for becoming a member and how it has affected my view of the zoo.